There’s seems to be this small group of people who were never good in math but decided to try to do it anyway. Our latest example is those that think there’s still 100,000 U.S. soldiers deployed to Iraq which is holding up the collective agreement for financial freedom.
Newshound Guru P…. Iraq is right on track to do some great things. They’re going to continue to do that. Let’s get this coalition forces out of there plus the United States military, which is why I think Al-Sudani is coming over here to talk to the president to see about getting these people out of there and leaving Iraq on it’s own devices.
When the U.S. pulled the troops officially in 2021, they left a “training” and support coalition of about 2500 troops. When you consider the largest embassy in the world is there with a land mass of 104 acres, leaving a contingent of troops to protect seems reasonable. But wait, do we have soldiers deployed at other locations around the globe? Of course we do. The breakdown looks something like this; Germany-33k troops, Italy-12k troops, South Korea-26k troops, Japan-53k troops, Spain-31k troops, Kuwait-2200 troops, and even 1700 in Turkey. So if we’re using troops deployed in the region as an excuse for any changes in the currency, I think we’re looking at the wrong line items. Again, so many people take things out of context and run with it. Any place there has ever been a conflict we were involved in, you can bet there will be some kind of military presence to prevent any future concerns. That doesn’t mean things won’t and can’t occur, but at least we feel like the presence should prevent the probability. There are things continuing to happen, so let’s keep our common sense to us and keep looking at things logically.
BWM